Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quran and the Modern Science
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:26, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
- Quran and the Modern Science (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Duplicates Quran, Islam and science and Maurice Bucaille, but much less NPOV. It reads like a personal essay extolling the very disputable assertion that the Quran agrees with science and contained scientific foreknowledge. It contains no encyclopaedic content except perhaps one statement about Bucaille. BethNaught (talk) 19:00, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete, for all the reasons BethNaught mentioned, and because the sources are unreliable. Consider, for example, the section in The Amazing Quran where the author consults with an embryologist, "who was so surprised at what he found that he changed his textbooks." An example of what he found? "In fact, he said that one item in particular - the Quran's description of the human being as a 'leech-like clot' ('alaqah) [Ghafir 40:67] - was new to him; but when he checked on it, he found that it was true, and so he added it to his book." RockMagnetist (talk) 19:55, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as an essay that isn't salvageable. No need at this point for a separate article from Islam and science, and nothing here worth merging. Moswento talky 19:56, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as duplication of Islam and science#Scientific topics in the Qur'an and Hadith.TheLongTone (talk) 20:42, 17 April 2014 (UTC)
- Speedy delete clearly duplicates Islam and science#Scientific topics in the Qur'an and Hadith. Flat Out let's discuss it 09:56, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete copied from: Islam and science. Rinfoli {*Di§cu$$ with me"#} 14:54, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete per WP:NOT#ESSAY. It seems like the article's creator is using the page as some kind of a blog or journal on his/her personal musings. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:51, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
- Delete as a content fork of Islam and science. Heaviness on the POV, and short content, makes this unsalvagable as even a stub. Bearian (talk) 15:53, 21 April 2014 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.